Monday, September 29, 2025

America 250 Warding off Trumpist Takeover

Nearly a fortnight ago I shared Bert Dunkerly’s Emerging Revolutionary War post about Sestercentennial logos, observing at the end that “the America 250 Facebook feed is being politically partisan and literally divisive.”

A few days later, the nonpartisan U.S. Semiquincentennial Commission in charge of America 250 fired its executive director, as reported in the Wall Street Journal, at Newsweek, and on C.N.N.

The commission stated that this administrator “initiated a security breach of a Commission social media account, attempted to procure the resignations of multiple commissioners by misrepresenting himself as acting on behalf of Congressional leadership, and engaged in multiple other serious and repeated breaches of authority and trust.” It accused him of having “engaged in unauthorized actions related to Commission approved programming, finances, and communications.”

In particular, weeks ago the commission “removed its website and social media platforms” from this administrator’s control. He then accessed those accounts to send out the Facebook post that I called politically partisan and others like it.

That now-former executive director is twenty-five years old. He was previously an assistant to Melania Trump as First Lady and a producer at Fox News. The Trump White House installed him at America 250 and assigned him to organize the U.S. Army parade in Washington, D.C., on Donald Trump’s birthday. The commission never officially voted to approve that parade, which received criticism for many reasons.

Meanwhile, the White House is proceeding with plans to celebrate the 250th anniversary of American independence in 2026 with various other forms of trumpery: gladiatorial games on the White House lawn, videos of historical figures created by theocratic propagandists, and pitting state fairs against each other to be designated by Trump as “most patriotic.”

5 comments:

  1. White House: the new Augean Stables.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The games on the White House lawn remind me of the 2006 movie, "Idiocracy", it was supposed to be a satire....now maybe a documentary?

    ReplyDelete
  3. By intentionally using hyperbolic and defamatory words like "gladiatorial" and, even worse, "theocratic propagandists", and by using charged phrases like "Trumpist takeover" that only serves to motivate the violent loons, it is YOU who is being "politically partisan" and "literally divisive" every time you stray from the mission of Boston 1775. It's sad that all the research you've done into Revolutionary Boston hasn't made you less of a Loyalist.

    ReplyDelete
  4. To start with, it’s presumptuous, obtuse, and obnoxious for you to declare what “the mission of Boston 1775” is.

    On this blog I’ve always discussed the memory and commemoration of the Revolution, the political principles behind it, and how both those memories and those principles can be abused.

    You’re correct that I deliberately chose the language in this posting, as I choose the language in all the postings.

    I called PragerU “theocratic propagandists” because the organization makes propaganda supporting Christian nationalism.

    I called what happened at America 250 a “Trumpist takeover” because, as the news stories said, the Trump White House installed a former Trump family aide who proceeded to work on Trump projects instead of what the Semiquincentennial Commission authorized him to do. He took control of the America 250 social media after being told he wasn’t authorized to do that, making his actions doubly Trumpist.

    I called Trump’s wish to stage fights on the White House lawn ”gladiatorial” because that looks like the best historical analogy: a politician staging public violence for mass entertainment. Back in June 2024 Trump even proposed having immigrants fight each other and then face professionals. His campaign appearance at a U.F.C. event inspired comparisons to ancient Rome. Others have made the same analogy as I did.

    Your attempt to police my language choices came on a day when Trump went in front of top U.S. military officers and talked about sending soldiers from the “War Department” into American cities to attack “the enemy from within.” And today brought just the latest of Trump’s many remarks cheering on violence and making threats.
    Trump supporters have been responding with physical violence since 2015. An honest person would show more concern about a President saying of his opponents, “They’re vicious, and they’re horrible,” than a blogger pointing out obvious theocratic propaganda.

    As to the historical comparison, let me spell this out clearly. We have a head of state who seeks to exercise monarchical power, bypass our elected officials, rewrite our laws, and send soldiers into our cities. The Americans of the 1770s who opposed that sort of program weren’t “Loyalist.” They were the Patriots who established the American republic, and right now we must strive to keep it.

    ReplyDelete