tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28102666.post4751499348750628321..comments2024-03-14T13:25:20.613-05:00Comments on Boston 1775: The Mystery in Dr. Warren’s Recovered LetterUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28102666.post-26499556045301396132011-02-13T15:22:55.727-05:002011-02-13T15:22:55.727-05:00The news articles suggest this letter was removed ...The news articles suggest this letter was removed from the archives sometime in the Colonial Revival Era, and moved through the collectors’ market until it ended up in James S. Copley’s hands. That collection was just auctioned, and some state archivists recognized the description of the document.J. L. Bellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15405157000473731801noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28102666.post-81239718144768951822011-02-13T07:12:13.888-05:002011-02-13T07:12:13.888-05:00Any idea who stole the letter from the Mass. Archi...Any idea who stole the letter from the Mass. Archives in the first place?RFullernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28102666.post-55467631784701688822011-02-12T16:45:50.278-05:002011-02-12T16:45:50.278-05:00It could be a comma. It could be a misplaced apost...It could be a comma. It could be a misplaced apostrophe. It could be a random mark.J. L. Bellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15405157000473731801noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28102666.post-85235547172567438502011-02-12T11:16:12.072-05:002011-02-12T11:16:12.072-05:00Is that a comma after "General"?Is that a comma after "General"?Joannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28102666.post-20050988915135502962011-02-12T09:36:45.909-05:002011-02-12T09:36:45.909-05:00Now that you say it, John, "Thomas" is a...Now that you say it, John, "Thomas" is an excellent match for those scrawled letters, and it makes perfect sense given the circumstances. I think you've hit on a discovery!Charles Bahnenoreply@blogger.com