Sunday, January 28, 2007

Why Israel Putnam?

Someone using the handle “richmond va” has sent in this question:
I’d like to ask if you could tell me why a Petersburg, Va. foundry in the early 1800’s would create a number of andirons in the likeness of Israel Putnam, rather than someone else more famous like G Washington. Thanks
Questioning the fame of Israel Putnam (1718-1790) shows that you’re not from Connecticut. I’m not, either, so I can answer the question.

In the early republic, Gen. Putnam was to Connecticut what Stonewall Jackson was to the Old Dominion after Reconstruction, except that the state didn’t also have a Robert E. Lee to share the attention. Connecticut’s modern household-name Revolutionary heroes hadn’t yet been discovered: Nathan Hale was still nothing more than an agent caught and hanged on his first mission, and the legend of Sybil Ludington was unknown outside her immediate family (if it was known there).

Putnam had been famous before the Revolution began because of his personal bravery, both in fighting against French and Indians and in bagging a wolf on his farm. Private soldiers also seem to have remained fond of “Old Put,” who could never act as aloofly as Washington. (He was also popular with a small coterie of British officers he had befriended during the earlier wars.) As a result, Connecticut and areas settled by folks from that state provided a strong market for Putnam memorabilia. The Petersburg foundry might also have made souvenirs of Washington and other Revolutionary heroes, of course.

Putnam’s actual record during the Revolutionary War never matched those early expectations. In the early 1800s there was an ongoing and sometimes vituperative argument over whether he or Col. William Prescott was in command at Bunker Hill. Now historians agree that Putnam spent most of his time riding around behind the lines unsuccessfully urging more provincial troops to join the fray.

Putnam didn’t have the strategic sense to match his personal bravery. He was forced into retreat at the Battle of Long Island in 1776, and abandoned Fort Clinton and Fort Montgomery to the British in 1777. Washington then assigned him to recruiting duty and later to regional commands. In 1779, Putnam suffered a bad stroke and had to retire to his farm.

Despite that record, early U.S. historians treated Putnam very well, listing him among the Continental Army’s most important commanders. Col. David Humphreys, a former aide (who was also from Connecticut), wrote a laudatory biography of the general in 1818. The general’s hasty retreat from British troops in Greenwich was turned (with a little massaging of the facts) into a legend. Even now, admirers and descendants of “Old Put” can be fervently loyal.

1 comment:

  1. Israel Putnam is buried in Brooklyn, CT. His epitaph reads like a checklist of all the things that eighteenth-century men were supposed to be:

    To the memory
    Of
    Israel Putnam, Esquire,
    Senior Major General in the Armies
    Of
    The United States of America
    Who
    Was born at Salem
    In the Province of Massachusetts
    On the seventh day of January
    A.D. 1718:
    And died
    On the twenty ninth day of May
    A.D. 1790:
    Passenger
    If thou art a Soldier
    Drop a Tear over the dust of a Hero
    Who
    Ever attentive
    To the lives and happiness of his Men
    Dared to lead
    Where any Dared to follow;
    If a Patriot
    Remember the distinguished and gallant services
    Rendered thy Country
    By the Patriot who sleeps beneath this Monument;
    If thou art Honest, generous & worthy
    Render a cheerful tribute of respect
    To a Man
    Whose generosity was singular
    Whose honesty was proverbial
    Who
    Raised himself to universal esteem
    And offices of Eminent distinction
    By personal worth
    And a
    Useful life

    ReplyDelete