I looked through my files for any references to St. Patrick’s Day from the Revolutionary period, and found one—of a sort. It appeared in the “Journal of the Times,” a series of newspaper essays sent out by Boston’s Whigs to printers in other American towns after the army first arrived in late 1768. Those articles reported on conflicts between the British military and the locals, always favoring the latter.
The “Journal” dispatch for 20 Mar 1769 said:
Saturday last [i.e., 18 March] being the anniversary of the repeal of the Stamp Act, the same was noticed as has been usual. The British flag was displayed on Liberty Tree, and at noon a number of gentlemen met in the hall under the same [see above], and the greatest order and decorum observed by the company.How much of this happened exactly this way? Though the “Journal” insists that the rumor about the effigy of St. Patrick was spread by provocateurs, Bostonians did parade with anti-Catholic effigies on Pope Night, and they did complain about how many of the soldiers were Irish Catholics.
The confinement of the soldiery to their barracks upon Saturday, together with a wicked report, which was spread among them by our enemies, that the Sons of Liberty had intended, to expose the effigy of St. Patrick, upon the Tree of Liberty, on said day, so provoked our military, that numbers of the three companies, quartering at Murray’s sugar-house [rented out by magistrate James Murray, but actually owned by his sister Elizabeth Smith], determined to sally forth that night, and cut down the Tree of Liberty;
accordingly, just before 11 o’clock the signal was given by firing a gun, as was intended, over the guard house, when by carelessness they fired a brace of balls [i.e., two musket balls] through the same, but happily hurt no one; immediately thereupon every man was out with his arms complete; and also axes and saws, to demolish the Tree of Liberty;
one soldier in his freak, fired a ball from one room to another, and shot the tail of a sergeant’s shirt off, but did no other damage: The officers were immediately alarmed, and by their intreaties and promise of pardon; the soldiery returned to their barracks, and remained quiet through the night.
As for the uproar in the guard house, I wouldn’t be surprised if the soldiers did get rowdy because of the holiday, their confinement, and the hostility of the town. But it would be characteristic of the Whigs to blame all the disturbance on a conspiracy aimed at their symbol of liberty.
In my feed, a claim that Boston's St. Patrick Day celebration dates to 1737 caught my attention. It seems most unlikely to me that Boston was celebrating St. Patrick's Day so early, at least publicly. There is always the possibility of a few Irishmen gathering at a tavern or the home of one of their number to celebrate. And we know that the army (at least the officers) did observe St. Patrick's Day.
ReplyDeleteWhat does your research say about Boston celebrating St. Patrick's Day as early as 1737?
The Irish Society, later the Charitable Irish Society, was founded in Boston on St. Patrick’s Day in 1737. That was a club and mutual-aid organization made up of men born in Ireland, all Protestant.
ReplyDeleteThe group continued to have an annual meeting, but (contrary to what its website now says) that dinner didn’t fall on 17 March again until 1794. By the 1800s that was the designated date, unless it fell on a Sunday. By that time the bar against Catholics was dropped.
Thus, one can say that some Bostonians celebrated St. Patrick’s Day in 1737, but not that Boston as a community did. So far as I can tell, there was no procession or any other public display, and certainly no governmental involvement.