In response, Boston 1775 reader John L. Smith, Jr., asked:
I had read in some journal or book somewhere that Benedict Arnold was 5' 5" tall. Have you ever run across that?I actually looked into the question of Arnold’s height when I drafted that posting, wondering if he really fit Adams’s description. And it turned out to be an interesting historiographical question.
So far as I know, no one who met Arnold ever wrote down his exact height. Instead, we have descriptions like these:
- Samuel Downing, a veteran of Saratoga: “He was dark-skinned, with black hair, and middling height; there was n’t any wasted timber in him”.
- John Henry, a veteran of the march to Québec: “He was well formed, very stoutly built, with a florid complexion.”
- Rev. J. S. Leake, son of a neighbor: “My father…has often described him to me, as about his own size, which was something below the middle height, well formed, muscular, and capable of great endurance.” (Extra trivia: Leake also said Arnold was ”the most accomplished and graceful skater” his father ever saw.)
However, that Benedict Arnold was identified as a weaver and laborer while the future general was already in training as an apothecary clerk. That Benedict Arnold was listed as coming from Norwalk, not Norwich, Connecticut. And at 5'9" that Benedict Arnold was above average height for a British-American of his time, not “middling” or “something below the middle height.”
There were several Benedict Arnolds in Connecticut and Rhode Island at the time, named after a seventeenth-century governor. One of them joined the New York militia, most modern biographers agree. Another one, shorter and already on a more lucrative career path, became a famous officer in the Continental and British armies.
So I don’t think we can say Arnold was 5'5" tall, which implies we can be precise to the inch. But we can say that contemporaries thought he was around that height, on the short side of the average range. And Louisa Catherine Adams, whose father and husband were both about 5'7", told her children that Arnold was “small.”
I just keep thinking how odd the scene must have looked on the trek to Ft. Ticonderoga: ~5'5" Benedict Arnold battling for command against the ~6'2" Ethan Allen!
ReplyDeleteArnold had the advantage of wealth, but Allen was older, taller, and had more friends. So Arnold wisely didn't press the case at first.
ReplyDeleteBut once Allen's men took Fort Ticonderoga, they started to disperse while Arnold's arrived in larger numbers. And his greater discipline soon put him in charge.
To regain the initiative, Allen took on more risky missions and got captured. I can't imagine Arnold was too surprise or too upset.