In his diary Rowe wrote on 6 Mar 1776:
This morning the Country People have thrown a Strong Work on Another Place on the Neck at Dorchester Nick. Gen. [William] Howe has order’d the Troops ashore again & tis now out of Doubt that Gen Howe will Leave this Town with his Troops &c—which has put The Inhabitants of This Town into Great Disorder Confusion & much Distress. . . .7 March:
The Firing has Ceas’d this day—
The Troops & Inhabitants very Busy in Getting All the Goods & Effects on board the Shipping in the Harbour—Rowe hadn’t described his wife as “my dear” for a while, possibly since the summer of 1774 when she was injured in a carriage accident. That’s a measure of the stress he was feeling now.
tis Impossible to describe the Distresses of this unfortunate Town
I din’d and spent the Evening at home with my Dear Mrs. Rowe Mr. [Ralph] Inman & Jack Rowe—
Genl. Robinson Pd. Mee a Visit
I believe the man Rowe referred to in this week as “Genl. Robinson” was Maj. Gen. James Robertson, barrack master general of the British army in North America. (Other documents, including selectman Timothy Newell’s journal and even Gen. Howe’s orderly book, also referred to him as “Robinson” at times.)
Back in 1768 Rowe had called Robertson a “Gentleman of Great Abilities & very cool & dispassionate.” He handled a lot of the army’s logistics, which at this moment meant safely moving the troops.
8 March:
My Situation has almost Distracted Me [i.e., driven me insane]John Inman was a young relative of Mrs. Rowe. There were multiple men named Archibald McNeil or McNeal in Boston in the 1770s, and this appears to have been the baker, perhaps working for the Rowes as a cook. Duncan also seems to have been a household servant, perhaps enslaved. They were all evidently ready to sail away with the troops, and Rowe felt they were deserting him personally—which means he had already made up his mind to stay.
John Inman Archy McNeil and Duncan are determin’d to Leave Mee—God Send Me Comfort in My Old Age—I try to do what Business I Can, but am Disapointd and nothing but Cruilty & Ingratitude falls to my Lot.
I Spend the Day & Evening with my Dear Mrs. Rowe Richd. Green & John Haskins—
9 March:
I dind at home with the Revd. Mr. [Samuel] Parker [shown above] Mrs. Rowe & Jack & Spent the Evening at the PosseeAs I wrote yesterday, I suspect that Rowe had a financial interest in the Minerva since he mentioned that ship and not others, but I can’t confirm that. Perhaps Gen. Robertson’s visit two days before was about the army’s need for that getaway vessel.
This day Genl. Robinson pressed the Ship Minerva into the Service—nothing but hurry & confusion, Every Person Striving to get Out of this Place
A Great Deal of Firing on both Sides this night
TOMORROW: Worse and worse.
John, I followed the link in yesterday's post and browsed through some of Mr. Rowe's diary, although not for March 1776. On several occasions he noted that he dined with both "Mr. Inman" and "Geo. Inman". So apparently those are two separate people. Not being versed in the genealogy of the Inman family (or of the Rowe family), I'm afraid I can't offer any more info.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Charlie. I first interpreted “Mr. Inman” as a reference to Ralph Inman, who was part of Rowe’s circle. But when I saw Rowe had George Inman, a nephew, in his household, I thought that he was more likely for this occasion.
ReplyDeleteOn 19 and 20 Apr 1775 Rowe’s diary referred to both “Mr. Inman” and “George Inman,” so Rowe was certainly making a distinction between them then.
On reflection, it makes sense for Rowe to reserve “Mr. Inman” for the family patriarch, Ralph, and refer to George Inman consistently by full name.