The Frick Art Reference Library listed such a painting in the collection of the Plimpton family. It was put up for auction in 2018 as “Portrait of a Gentleman” and “attributed to Circle of Copley,” but failed to sell at the estimated price of $5-7,000.
The homeowner contacted the Plimptons and convinced them to donate the portrait to the Matawan Historical Society. On retrieving the canvas, he discovered that “The nameplate on the frame identified the subject as Philip Freneau, and the artist as John Singleton Copley.”
The local newspaper presents this as evidence of an exciting rediscovery of an authentic portrait. It’s merely evidence that at some point that painting was labeled and sold as Copley’s portrait of Freneau.
But we knew that already. The American Art Annual for 1923 reported that painting had sold the previous year for $260. Undoubtedly its price was higher for having the names of a famous artist and a famous subject attached—but by whom? There’s no evidence Copley made such a portrait and no mention of this canvas before that date.
In the 1920s, as I discussed back here, the Copley Gallery in Boston sold a lot of eighteenth-century portraits as products of colonial America. Those canvases probably showed little-known British gentlemen as painted by little-known British portraitists. But their value increased if rich Americans believed they came from the few artists working in North America before the Revolution and showed people whose names appeared in our history books.
In 1941 Lewis Leary published the biography That Rascal Freneau: A Study in Literary Failure. In a footnote he wrote:
Another “Freneau portrait,” listed in the Frick Art Reference Library, 1121 14Q, as by Copley, represents a young man dressed in the attire of a dandy of about 1770. It is not mentioned by Barbara Neville Parker and Ann Bolling Wheeler, John Singleton Copley, American Portraits in Oil, Pastel and Miniatures with Biographical Sketches, Boston, 1938. The portrait is at present part of the George A. Plimpton Collection, Columbia University Library. “I cannot find,” says Mrs. Plimpton in a letter (June 24, 1938) to the writer, “that we have anything but the dealer’s word for the authenticity of the Freneau portrait.” I have been convinced that it is neither by Copley nor of Freneau.The Frick Art Reference Library continues to list that painting as “not by Copley.” As for the “Circle of Copley,” in 1770 that circle consisted entirely of Henry Pelham, who didn’t travel with his stepbrother to the New York area when he supposedly painted this canvas.
Oh, what a tangled web we weave,
ReplyDeleteWhen first we practise to deceive!
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4010/4010-h/4010-h.htm
I just purchased va auction a tiny 4x6 pencil sketch signed by John Singleton Copley action estimate was $300/600. My bid was the only one which i got it for $150. Now i would like to find it listed somewhere in his list of works just the same to validate this to is authentic....lone of those situations where i want to "trust, but verify" what i have. Copley does have pencil sketches out there so its not uncommon....i collect autographs of founding fathers, revolutionary key figures of interest etc. and living in Ma. i thought this would be a great addition to add to my Thomas Hutchinson document, to some coloiL notes signed by members who signed the US Constitution, Presidential Autographs, letters from Jed Huntington who was General under Washington. Interesting note his wife Faith traveled from Ct back with him and other wifes of the General back to Roxbury (Boston) Camp...due to a carriage axle/break delay the Battle of Bunker Hill in Charlestown was ending when the arrived....Seeing the bloody result of war sent Faith into depression and friends and family could not shake her from it. Within less than 6 months from when they first started traveling to Boston Faith hung herself. Has they say, war is hell. It effects so many directly and many more indirectly.
ReplyDelete