J. L. BELL is a Massachusetts writer who specializes in (among other things) the start of the American Revolution in and around Boston. He is particularly interested in the experiences of children in 1765-75. He has published scholarly papers and popular articles for both children and adults. He was consultant for an episode of History Detectives, and contributed to a display at Minute Man National Historic Park.

Subscribe thru Follow.it





•••••••••••••••••



Showing posts with label Dennett-Milton Woodward. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dennett-Milton Woodward. Show all posts

Thursday, October 06, 2016

Ran Away from the Regiment?

This notice appeared in the 16 Jan 1769 Boston Chronicle:
STOLEN or STRAYED,
From the 59th Regiment Barrack in New-Boston, the 11th inst. January; a small brown and white Spanish DOG, answers to the name of Bravo, had on a brass Collar, marked Den. M. Woodward 59th Regt.—

Who ever has found the said DOG, and will bring him to the Barrack aforesaid, or to the Printers hereof, shall receive one DOLLAR reward.
“New-Boston” was also called West Boston or the West End. It was developed after other parts of the peninsula.

Here is a George Stubbs painting of a “Spanish Dog” from 1775.

Bravo the dog’s owner was Ens. Dennett-Milton Woodward of the 59th. He was probably with one of the two companies from that regiment (including the grenadiers) sent to Boston in 1768 alongside the 14th and 29th and some Royal Artillery. (The 64th and 65th also came, straight from Ireland.)

Woodward received his first commission in 1760, which suggests he was in his twenties when he lost his dog. The 59th companies returned to Halifax in May 1769. Alas, I don’t know if Bravo went with them.

Woodward returned to Boston as a lieutenant with a wife and children in 1774; the family then came to the attention of Boston 1775 because one child contracted smallpox. Eventually Woodward rose to the rank of lieutenant-colonel in the 34th Regiment. He died in 1798.

(Shown above, courtesy of Colonial Williamsburg, is an eighteenth-century engraved metal dog collar, perhaps of the sort Ens. Woodward had made for his dog.)

Friday, July 17, 2009

“Neither...would own that they had received the Infection by Inoculation.”

Even though Boston’s selectmen reacted quickly to the news on 22 Nov 1774 that children in two soldiers’ families had come down with the smallpox, they weren’t quick enough. The published records aren’t clear, but it looks like on 26 November there was more bad news:

Dr. [Charles] Jarvis informed the Selectmen that a Child at Magrath in Marshalls Lane the Soldiers House where the other Children were sent from had undoubted Symptoms of the Small Pox—upon which the Child was carried to the Hospital at New Boston by its Father
The next day another child in the same house—now referred to as “Mrs. Megros in Marshalls Lane”—fell ill. This child belonged to Lt. Dennett-Milton Woodward of the 59th. That was the same regiment that the soldiers were in.

The disease began to run its course in the first infected children, Dr. Jarvis also reported. They had a standard response, as in this example from 17 December:
Dr. Jarvis who has the care of the Hospital at West Boston haveg. reported to the Selectmen that three of the Children sent there with the Small Pox vizt. two of one Burkins, and one of Magrath Are now recovered, and that in his Opinion they might be permitted to leave the Hospital with safety to the Inhabitants.

Orders were accordingly given to Mr. William Darrington Keeper of said Hospital to permit their leaving it so soon as he had well smoked and cleansed them, and fresh Suits of Clothing were provided for them.
However, that evening the selectmen heard more disturbing news:
Information being given by Dr. Latham that the Small Pox was broke out in Dr. [Trotter] Hills House in Hanover Street, and at Capt. Figgs opposite the White Horse [tavern] South End—Dr. Jarvis was directed to examine into the Circumstances of these Families & Report their state.

Dr. Jarvis Reported, that he had visited these Familys, & found that Dr. Hills Wife & three Children were nearly passed thro’ the Small Pox and that several of Capt. Figgs Children had the Disorder—but that neither the Capt. nor Dr. would own that they had received the Infection by Inoculation.
It’s obvious that Jarvis and the town officials thought that Hill, an army surgeon, had inoculated his children and perhaps those of Capt.-Lt. James Figge. (The captain’s name is transcribed in the published town records as “Trig.” However, in the newspapers and lists of army officers it appears as some variation on “Figge.”)

Such inoculation carried the risk of spreading the disease, and was therefore supposed to take place only under controlled conditions. Even then, many people distrusted the process; earlier in 1774, Marbleheaders had rioted and destroyed a smallpox hospital that was about to open in their harbor because they feared its patients would spread the disease. And now Boston’s highest officials suspected Dr. Hill had decided to carry out the procedure on his own authority, ignoring local rules—a metaphor for everything the Patriots resented about the government in London.

TOMORROW: The selectmen look for a response.