J. L. BELL is a Massachusetts writer who specializes in (among other things) the start of the American Revolution in and around Boston. He is particularly interested in the experiences of children in 1765-75. He has published scholarly papers and popular articles for both children and adults. He was consultant for an episode of History Detectives, and contributed to a display at Minute Man National Historic Park.

Subscribe thru Follow.it





•••••••••••••••••



Monday, August 14, 2023

“The ever-memorable Anniversary”

The Boston Gazette published on Monday, 17 Aug 1767, included this local report:

Friday last being the ever-memorable Anniversary of the 14th of August, a great Number of Gentlemen met at Liberty-Hall, under the sacred Elm, which was decently decorated, and drank the following Toasts.
  1. The King.
  2. The Queen and Royal Family.
  3. The Sons of Liberty.
  4. All Mankind.
  5. Friends to America in Great-Britain.
  6. May an Abhorrence of Slavery still and ever remain the best Criterion of a true British Subject.
  7. None but Tories Slaves.
  8. America.
  9. The 14th of August 1765.
  10. May the 26th of August 1765, be veil’d in perpetual Darkness.
  11. May every House of Respresentatives in America strenuously defend what they have wisely resolv’d.
  12. Union, Stability and Fidelity among the Sons of Liberty throughout America.
  13. May the Man who will not defend the Cause of his Country, in Case of Danger, be held in universal Contempt by every Son of Virtue and Liberty.
  14. May that Day which sees America submit to Slavery, be the last of her Existence.
That Friday, 14 August, was the second anniversary of Boston’s first public protest against the Stamp Act, which inspired a wave of similar protests all along the North American coast and even into the Caribbean. Boston’s political organizers were proud of that.

They weren’t proud of the mob that had nearly destroyed Lt. Gov. Thomas Hutchinson’s house twelve days later. In these toasts they mentioned that event once, but they thought they got away with it all right.

As for the numerous mentions of “Slavery,” these gentlemen meant political slavery, or giving up their traditional British rights. They didn’t mean, you know, slavery slavery.

No comments: