The Sestercentennial of Salem as the Seat of Government
Gov. Thomas Hutchinson prorogued the Massachusetts General Court on 8 Mar 1774, stating:
Two months later, Gen. Thomas Gage arrived as the new governor, and the legislature didn’t have Thomas Hutchinson to kick around anymore.
A newly elected General Court convened in Boston on 25 May. By the end of the day, the legislatures had elected twenty-eight gentlemen to sit on the new Council.
The next morning, Gov. Gage vetoed thirteen of those men. So things were off to a smooth start.
The House started to address the petitions, bills, and other business before it. On Saturday, 28 May, the governor sent a message that he was adjourning the legislature, and the term would start up again on 7 June in the courthouse at Salem (shown above).
That action was part of the British government’s policy of isolating and punishing Boston until the town repaid the cost of the tea destroyed the previous December. Gage acted on instructions from London. Deciding when and where the legislature would meet had long been a Massachusetts governor’s power.
Naturally, the House’s first business when it reconvened was to complain about having to be in Salem. Its resolution argued that since Gage had acted “unnecessarily, or merely in Obedience to an Instruction, and without exercising that Judgment and Discretion of his own,” he wasn’t properly exercising the governor’s prerogative.
A day after that, the House members responded to Gage’s speech opening the session with more complaints about being in Salem.
Late on the morning of 9 June, the House made itself “a Committee to consider the State of the Province” after the Boston Port Bill. After some private and unrecorded debate, the lawmakers appointed a committee to recommend responses to that situation. Its members were:
That committee thus included three of Boston’s four representatives to the General Court. The remaining member was John Hancock, who’s not mentioned in the record of the Salem session, suggesting he wasn’t even there.
Paine later wrote that eight of those men “were considered as firm in the Opposition to British measures.” The exception?
I have passed over without notice the groundless, unkind, and illiberal charges and insinuations made by each of the other branches against the Governor…So those insinuations didn’t bother him, not at all.
Two months later, Gen. Thomas Gage arrived as the new governor, and the legislature didn’t have Thomas Hutchinson to kick around anymore.
A newly elected General Court convened in Boston on 25 May. By the end of the day, the legislatures had elected twenty-eight gentlemen to sit on the new Council.
The next morning, Gov. Gage vetoed thirteen of those men. So things were off to a smooth start.
The House started to address the petitions, bills, and other business before it. On Saturday, 28 May, the governor sent a message that he was adjourning the legislature, and the term would start up again on 7 June in the courthouse at Salem (shown above).
That action was part of the British government’s policy of isolating and punishing Boston until the town repaid the cost of the tea destroyed the previous December. Gage acted on instructions from London. Deciding when and where the legislature would meet had long been a Massachusetts governor’s power.
Naturally, the House’s first business when it reconvened was to complain about having to be in Salem. Its resolution argued that since Gage had acted “unnecessarily, or merely in Obedience to an Instruction, and without exercising that Judgment and Discretion of his own,” he wasn’t properly exercising the governor’s prerogative.
A day after that, the House members responded to Gage’s speech opening the session with more complaints about being in Salem.
Late on the morning of 9 June, the House made itself “a Committee to consider the State of the Province” after the Boston Port Bill. After some private and unrecorded debate, the lawmakers appointed a committee to recommend responses to that situation. Its members were:
- speaker Thomas Cushing
- Joseph Hawley
- clerk Samuel Adams
- William Phillips
- Robert Treat Paine
- James Warren
- John Tyng
- Daniel Leonard
- Timothy Pickering
That committee thus included three of Boston’s four representatives to the General Court. The remaining member was John Hancock, who’s not mentioned in the record of the Salem session, suggesting he wasn’t even there.
Paine later wrote that eight of those men “were considered as firm in the Opposition to British measures.” The exception?
by the mixture of nominations from both parties in the House the Name of Daniel Leonard was so repeated, that the Speaker found himself Obliged to nominate him & he was chosen.TOMORROW: Who was Daniel Leonard?
1 comment:
William Tyng of Falmouth was royal sheriff of Cumberland County, Maine, and became a Loyalist during the war, though he returned to the U.S. of A. in 1793. Since Leonard was the only member of the committee not known as a committed Whig, that’s another sign that “Col. Tyng” must not have been William.
Post a Comment