J. L. BELL is a Massachusetts writer who specializes in (among other things) the start of the American Revolution in and around Boston. He is particularly interested in the experiences of children in 1765-75. He has published scholarly papers and popular articles for both children and adults. He was consultant for an episode of History Detectives, and contributed to a display at Minute Man National Historic Park.

Subscribe thru Follow.it





•••••••••••••••••



Monday, April 28, 2025

“Fidelity is not given to a single individual”

On Patriots’ Day the towns of Danvers and Peabody come together again to honor the men who marched from that area on 19 Apr 1775 to confront the British regulars.

Seven men in the Danvers company were killed in the fighting at Menotomy.

The Danvers town archivist, author Richard B. Trask (shown here), was among the speakers at this year’s ceremony. He said: “I cannot ignore, at today’s remembrance of the sacrifice for liberty made by our ancient brethren, the danger that I believe our nation now faces.”

Caroline Enos reported for the Salem News:
Their sacrifice led to the nation’s Declaration of Independence in 1776 and, in 1789, the creation of the Constitution, said Trask, one of the most respected historians of the Salem Witch Trials and North Shore colonial history who is a founding member of the Danvers Alarm List Co.

“Our form of government was codified by the ratification of the United States Constitution,” he said. “It included the establishment of co-equal branches of government, the judicial, executive and legislative. But our Constitution and our way of life can only be preserved by a vigilant citizenry who insists these branches perform as specified in this our founding document.”

Trask said the Executive branch has overstepped its power by disregarding the checks and balances enshrined in the Constitution. He criticized the Department of Government Efficiency, created under President Donald Trump upon taking office in January, for its mass firings of government employees and its steps to defund agencies and programs without the consent of Congress, which is responsible for appropriating the government’s funds.

The Trump administration’s mass deportations of undocumented migrants and, in a growing number of cases, immigrants who came into the country legally, has disregarded the Constitution’s right to due process before American courts, Trask said.

“Our Constitution and our way of life can only be preserved by a vigilant citizenry who insists these branches perform as specified in this our founding document,” he said.

“Fidelity is not given to a single individual, a group or a party, but to the adherence to the words and the meaning of our Constitution.”

Trask’s words of concern followed his detailed account of the events of April 19, 1775. “We must, at this time, be brave as those young men, who in ‘75 were willing to lay their lives on the altar of liberty for a cause bigger than themselves, when our country and its future seemed in peril.”

Much of the crowd cheered or clapped for Trask as he used his walker to step back from the podium. Some who were sitting gave him a standing ovation. Others were upset.
Loyalists were upset at criticism of their king in 1776, too.

6 comments:

Donald C. Carleton, Jr. said...

Huzzah for Richard Trask!

But I take issue with your implied characterization of Loyalists as the Maga-heads of 1775/6.

Their dispute with the Radical Whigs wasn't about blind cultish obediance to a tyrant but an adherance to an imperial constititional framework they (the Loyalists) thought was a valuable inheritance and one that could be salvaged. They may have been completely wrongheaded in that belief but I think it had a great deal more integrity that what we're seeing among you-know-who's adherents today!

Cortney Skinner said...

Thank you, Mr. Bell and thank you Mr. Trask!

Marilynne Roach said...

And I second the huzzah! Democracy always did take work and we need to be reminded of that. Thank you.

Jayne Triber said...

Labels are tricky. Pretty sure the Loyalists thought they were the "patriots," and the so-called "patriots" were traitors trying to overthrow a legitimate government. Richard Trask's talk was excellent. I took a great U.S. history course with him at Salem State years ago (too many years for me to admit).

J. L. Bell said...

That’s why I’m comfortable using the terms Patriots and Loyalists from late 1774 on, because the actual words are basically synonyms but the programs and actions behind those words became very clear.

As a small-d democrat and small-r republican (speaking of synonyms), I think the Loyalists’ adherence to monarchy was short-sighted faith in a system of hereditary power. That’s not as simplistic or deluded as “blind cultish obedience to a tyrant.” Nonetheless, it’s closer to that obedience than I think wise, especially when we now have centuries of history and many models of better, stronger societies.

Mike said...

As a right-leaning centrist, I'm reminded of the well-known quote you've written about on several occasions: "A republic, if you can keep it". I think we're at the "if you can keep it" part.