J. L. BELL is a Massachusetts writer who specializes in (among other things) the start of the American Revolution in and around Boston. He is particularly interested in the experiences of children in 1765-75. He has published scholarly papers and popular articles for both children and adults. He was consultant for an episode of History Detectives, and contributed to a display at Minute Man National Historic Park.

Subscribe thru Follow.it





•••••••••••••••••



Friday, June 16, 2023

“Slavery in Boston” Exhibit Now Open in Faneuil Hall

Today the city of Boston’s Department of Archaeology officially opens its new exhibit in Faneuil Hall, titled “Slavery in Boston.”

The display panels are already up, so I swung by to see them yesterday. The exhibit is in two parts, with an online component as well.

One part is on the ground floor of Faneuil Hall, among the shops selling books, souvenirs, and candy. This consists mostly of vertical panels set up around the building’s structural pillars. Some of the panels have basic introductory material, and some look at the legacy of race-based slavery in the area.

Most of the pillars, however, profile individual enslaved people, using all the sources available to show even a sense of their lives. That sees like a powerful way to communicate the experience of slavery on a one-to-one level to visitors who think they have just a minute or two to spare.

Those visitors who want to learn more (or use the restrooms) can go downstairs, where there’s a larger space and the rest of the exhibit. This area includes benches, a television monitor (now showing a video about abolitionist Lewis Hayden), and an activity table for kids.

Here the walls are lined with panels providing a more general introduction to the laws, economics, and demographics of slavery in Boston. Some of this repeats information upstairs, and sometimes it builds on that. One major message is that in the mid-1700s slavery affected all Bostonians’ daily lives and produced benefits for most free people, not just slaveowners.

At times, the presentation might even be too Boston-centered. One panel describes Charles Apthorp becoming the town’s richest merchant by trading with the Caribbean islands, Britain, and Africa. His business included buying and selling people. That panel could add that Apthorp’s ties to the slavery economy included marrying an heiress, Grizzell Eastwick, born on Jamaica.

A few of the “Slavery in Boston” panels display archeological finds related to households that included enslaved people, but most of the information behind this exhibit comes from documentary sources: legal and church records, newspapers, letters, and so on.

So why is this an Archaeology Department display? I suspect it’s because that’s the branch of local government most concerned with Boston’s past rather than its present and future.

4 comments:

Don Carleton said...

The new Faneuil Hall installation on Boston's entanglement with slavery looks like an important and necessary effort.

But in looking at the shots you've posted, I cringe to see amount of text on the interpretive panels.

The museum field now has REAMS of data about completely ineffective the "book on the wall" model is in terms of stimulating real visitor engagement. I would have RADICALLY reduced the amount of exhibit text on display in hopes of more effectively getting the core/key points across.

I genuinely fear many tourists will just breeze by the panels and absorb very little. There has to a better way…

J. L. Bell said...

It’s definitely a text-centered exhibit, with no original artifacts or interactive features. The most important text for most visitors might indeed be just that “Slavery in Boston” title, acknowledging the history.

Anonymous said...

I totally agree with you Don, when there is to much text by each picture, than the visitor just brezze's by my self included! I have never thought of that before but you are so correct!

Phil Eibling

rfuller said...

Text-centered means that only the converted will read it, to make sure it toes the line. There has to be a better way.